Included, Not Excluded – Every autistic learner. Every choice. Every future.
Author: Hannah Smith and Rachael Hlomador, Outreach Consultants
Contributor: Staff
24th May 2023 | 6 mins read
Historically, autism has been more associated with males – it is estimated to be 3 times more prevalent in males than in females[1] although until recently this figure was much higher. Due to this, research has largely focused on autism expression mainly in men and boys. Diagnostic tools are skewed towards male based stereotypes of autistic traits[2], meaning that autistic females are often overlooked or underdiagnosed.
Research is now moving towards better understanding of autism expression in women and girls. There is a difference in characteristics presented in autistic boys and men[3], with the female expression of autism being one that does not meet the current diagnostic criteria. We’ll be taking a look at some of the key differences as well as looking at the lived experiences of autistic women at school.
The ‘female autism phenotype’ refers to the characteristics of autistic women and girls. The differences in expression are broken down below into four different areas and compared to the diagnostic criteria as defined by the DSM-5 (2013). When you are reading, consider how the male expression of autism may lend itself more towards an autism diagnosis than the female expression.
Diagnostic criteria;
Autistic males can be less motivated to form social relationships whereas autistic females show similar motivations to form social relationships as non-autistic females[4].
Diagnostic criteria;
Masking is a process where individuals imitate others, and hide or stop behaviours to ‘fit in’ with society. This can lead to difficulties such as mental health issues. While being more likely in females, it can occur with males and those who are gender fluid or non-binary. Camouflaging can involve copying others, preparing and rehearsing a script for social interactions, or being highly observant of others e.g., laughing along with a joke even if they have not understood the context or the joke. Masking and camouflaging makes identifying autistic girls and women difficult as they don’t appear to have the traditional autistic traits.
Diagnostic criteria;
Autistic males are often more interested in ‘objects’ whereas autistic females may be more interested in topics with ‘relational’ purposes, showing more motivation to form relationships with people or pets as opposed to ‘objects’. Self-stimulatory behaviour often seen in autistic females is perceived as more socially appropriate, such as twirling their hair, humming or fiddling with a pen.
Diagnostic criteria;
It is understood that there are further differences between autistic males and females in the ways in which they express distress:
|
‘Internalising’ distress = inwards expression; may include anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and self-harm |
‘Externalising’ distress = outward expression; physical behaviours directed towards others/the environment |
Due to not receiving appropriate diagnoses in a timely manner, autistic girls might not get the support they need at school. If the right support isn’t in place, this can lead to mental distress and emotionally based school avoidance (EBSA).
Below we explore the unique experiences of autistic females and the challenges they faced in education and school*. We focused on 5 key areas; friendships, relationships with teachers, teaching approaches, school environment (sensory aspects), and overall wellbeing along with their advice for educational professionals working with autistic female pupils.
*The views shared here may not represent all autistic females.
Making friends during school was a challenge. They wanted to make friends but didn’t know how to and so felt alienated from other girls. They found it harder to relate to the same gender because of ‘social rules’ for example, they either didn’t display popular characteristics or didn’t have shared interests[6].
Advice:
Relationships with teachers were friendship based. They bonded more with a teacher who shared the same interests and they felt supported them.
Advice:
Teaching felt like it was not individualised. Some felt they were given less support because they were more able than their peers or because they had good grades. They wanted their specific strengths to be recognised and enhanced.
Advice:
A small school helped to reduce the impact of sensory overload. For others who attended larger schools, these were found to be very noisy, and impacted on concentration. When non-school uniform was offered at secondary school, this reduced anxiety as school uniform at primary school had been very uncomfortable.
Advice:
Being told they were different and being treated differently led to low self-esteem, internalised ableism and self-hate. People tended to associate their shyness to autism and failed to explore other co-occurring conditions such as social anxiety.
Advice:
Please note that if someone is displaying some of the behaviours listed below, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are autistic but they can be signifiers. If you have any concerns about a child or young person, it’s important to speak to a medical professional.
For more detail on the subject, watch our Lunch and Learn below.
[1] The NHS, Mental Health of Children and Young People in England, (2017)
[2] Navarro-Pardo, E., López-Ramón, M.F., Alonso-Esteban, Y. and Alcantud-Marín, F., 2021. Diagnostic tools for autism spectrum disorders by gender: Analysis of current status and future lines. Children, 8(4), p.262.
[3] Hull et al, 2020, The Female Autism Phenotype and Camouflaging: a Narrative Review, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40489-020-00197-9
[4] Sedgewick et al., 2015 Gender Differences in the Social Motivation and Friendship Experiences of Autistic and Non-autistic Adolescents – PubMed (nih.gov)
[5] Solomon et al., 2012 Autism Symptoms and Internalizing Psychopathology in Girls and Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorders – PMC (nih.gov)
[6] Dark, J., 2022. The Lost Generation of Autistic Women’s Experiences of Secondary School: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Approach. Educational Psychology Research and Practice, 8(1), pp.1-11.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
WhatsApp
Messenger
Reddit
SMS